When I was a schoolboy, my differences to my classmates always seemed to be big pass away marks for me. I was very good at mathematics, more over very weak in sports. On the contrary, although my classmates often had minor grades in maths, they were real footb tout ensembleers and athletes. Or I could drum every(prenominal) music pieces and songs I heard on TV or in tapes though I couldnt discern the lyrics of the songs, while my friends were fitted to key you exactly what the singer was saying but had hindrance evening in recognising the music parts. I wondered if, because of having good grades, I was an juristic savant, why I never learned how to pass or shoot accurately when playing football. In sports classes, that intelligent student was just a clumsy kid. Well, I wasnt the solo ace who thought of this sort of differences between people. Many scholars all all over the world have thought of individual differences. there were some assumptions and hypotheses ab out the factors which made people intellectually distinguishable from each other. But the first person who put onward an organize theory was Dr Howard Gardner. This well-known American cognitive psychologist gave a f mien(a) explanation for all questions regarding intelligence. He called his theory Multiple intelligence post (MI).
Im going to review the evolution of the notion of intelligence in history, and briefly explain the theory. Then Ill deal with the way educators expend this theory in language teaching, and finally Ill mention any(prenominal) criticisms against the MI theory. Before 20th century, th e word intelligent all over the world even d! idnt have a precise meaning. people only knew that its got a positive meaning. For example, individuals living in the air jacket were called intelligent if they were quick, articulate or wise. In other cultures, the star who... If you involve to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment